
Rhode Island Man Charged for Threats Against Trump
DOJ charges Carl Montague after he allegedly threatened to kill President Trump and top officials on Truth Social.
DOJ Files Charges After Violent Threats on Social Media
A Rhode Island man has been arrested and charged after allegedly making violent threats against President Donald Trump and several top administration officials on Truth Social. The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that 37-year-old Carl D. Montague faces multiple charges, including threats against the president, interstate threats, and threats to assault, kidnap, or murder U.S. officials, judges, or law enforcement officers.
According to a criminal complaint filed by the FBI, the incident began late on June 27, 2025, when Trump Media and Technology, the parent company of Truth Social, alerted authorities to a threatening post. The profanity-laced message targeted President Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, stating an intent to kill them. The FBI quickly initiated an investigation that led agents to Montague’s residence in Rhode Island.
Upon contact, Montague allegedly admitted to posting the threats and stated that he had been smoking a significant amount of marijuana at the time. He also told agents that he deleted his Truth Social account after sending the message. The criminal complaint notes that Montague was upset with the current political climate and used social media to vent his frustration, but he could not explain why he specifically named Miller or Bondi and was reportedly unable to identify Bondi.
No Immediate Threat Discovered, But Charges Filed
While Montague expressed remorse for his actions, the FBI determined that he did not own or have access to any weapons and had not made any plans, intentions, or arrangements to travel in order to carry out the threats. Nevertheless, federal investigators found probable cause to pursue charges of threatening harm against the president and other senior officials, underscoring the seriousness with which authorities treat threats to public officials.
The DOJ’s actions highlight ongoing efforts to address threats made against government figures, especially in a climate of heightened political tensions and increased scrutiny of social media platforms. The case serves as a reminder that online threats, regardless of intent or means, can have severe legal consequences.
As the legal process moves forward, Montague’s case will likely be closely watched as an example of federal enforcement in response to threats targeting national leaders. The DOJ emphasized its commitment to protecting officials and maintaining the integrity of public service against intimidation and violence.